List About Books I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist

Title	:	I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist
Author	:	Norman L. Geisler
Book Format	:	Paperback
Book Edition	:	Anniversary Edition
Pages	:	Pages: 447 pages
Published	:	March 12th 2004 by Crossway Books (first published 2004)
Categories	:	Christian. Religion. Nonfiction. Christianity. Theology. Faith

I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist Paperback | Pages: 447 pages

Explanation Supposing Books I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist

To some, the concept of having faith in a higher power or a set of religious beliefs is nonsensical. Indeed, many view religion in general, and Christianity in particular, as unfounded and unreasonable.

Norman Geisler and Frank Turek argue, however, that Christianity is not only more reasonable than all other belief systems, but is indeed more rational than unbelief itself. With conviction and clear thinking, Geisler and Turek guide readers through some of the traditional, tested arguments for the existence of a creator God. They move into an examination of the source of morality and the reliability of the New Testament accounts concerning Jesus. The final section of the book deals with a detailed investigation of the claims of Christ. This volume will be an interesting read for those skeptical about Christianity, as well as a helpful resource for Christians seeking to articulate a more sophisticated defense of their faith.

Mention Books During I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist

Original Title:	I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist
ISBN:	1581345615 (ISBN13: 9781581345612)
Edition Language:	English

Rating About Books I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist

Ratings: 4.21 From 4485 Users | 437 Reviews

Evaluation About Books I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist

This book is great because by using science, logic, and history it explains why God exists and why Jesus was more than just a person. Over all it states the case for why believing in a higher being requires LESS faith than believing in nothing. I would recommend this book to Christians, people of other religions, those questioning a higher power, and Atheists.

This book is great when it comes to evidence about the existence of God. I liked it because it provides logic based arguments instead of merely faith based statements..

I love that Geisler and Turek put their argument up front. It gives the book a solid structure, and it gets the conversation going. We can get right to the point. I liked less the tone. They write with an I'm-smarter-than-you vibe that will likely turn off those who most need the information. Finally, while I understand the snarky reversal intended by the book's title, it may do more harm than good. It plays into mistaken notions of "blind" faith. It misunderstands what faith is and how it's

This book takes a basic approach to defending Christianity as a l/ogical choice. The first portion is geared from a scientific perspective and how the world could not come into existence on its own, which includes discussion of the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Due to there being a creator (the book does not endorse creation science, but more so intelligent design) there must be a God (Jew, Christian, or Muslim). The authors then discuss the possibility of miracles, which must be true based on how

[image error]It may be unfair, even mean-spirited of me to review and rate this book, being an atheist who is supremely vexed by all things anti-science (or misrepresentative of science). I suppose it would be remiss of me not to mention what the authors would call my anti-supernatural bias prior to reading this book, but as they themselves seem to enjoy pointing out, being biased doesnt mean one is wrong. Perhaps I should leave this books worth-assessment to those who think Apologetics and

This book is great! I recommend it to Christians or people who have serious doubts about the Christian faith. Atheist will probably say that the arguments are straw-man or the facts are not reliable. I really enjoyed the first two chapters about logic and the knowledge of truth. A great part is where Norm is telling the story of how he, in only a few sentences, destroys the logical positivism course of one of his professors from Detroit University. Then the book deals with some arguments

This book was given to me by my daughter who has become a Fundamentalists and she is trying her utmost to bring into the fold. As a courtesy to her, I slogged my way through it and found it to be a waste of time. The book is shot full with fallacies, dubious psychological extrapolations, bad philosophy and muddled thinking.We did have some good discussions though :)))